A recent remark by an ex-member of the Planning Commission has reignited debates over illegal migrants in Assam. The controversial statement, “Bangladeshi aaye to kya hua,” has drawn sharp reactions from political leaders, civil groups, and citizens. While the comment reflects a perspective on migration and inclusivity, it also underscores the deep sensitivities tied to Assam’s identity, security, and demographic balance.
Controversial remark on illegal migrants in Assam
During a public discussion, the ex-Planning Commission member stated that Bangladeshis coming to Assam should not be viewed as a serious problem. According to him, migration from neighboring regions has historically shaped Indian society and should be accepted as part of a natural process.
However, for Assam, the issue is far more complex. Illegal migrants in Assam have been at the heart of decades-long political struggles, mass movements, and even violent conflicts. The comment, therefore, was immediately criticised by several Assamese groups who believe it undermines their struggle to protect cultural identity and land rights.
Read More: Meghalaya CM Meets Asom Gana Parishad Leaders in Shillong
Assam’s long history with migration
Assam’s demographic landscape has changed significantly over the decades. The influx of people from present-day Bangladesh, both before and after Partition, has shaped many of the state’s social and political issues. Concerns about land alienation, resource pressure, and cultural dilution have fueled tensions for years.
The Assam Movement of 1979–1985 was a direct result of public anger against the growing number of illegal migrants in Assam. It culminated in the signing of the Assam Accord in 1985, which set a cut-off date of March 24, 1971, for identifying foreigners. Yet, despite this agreement, illegal migration has remained a contentious and unresolved issue.
This history explains why the remark by the ex-Planning Commission member has triggered such widespread reactions. For many Assamese, illegal migrants are not just a demographic statistic but a threat to their cultural and political existence.
Political reactions to the statement
Unsurprisingly, the remark sparked immediate political controversy. Leaders from Assam-based parties strongly opposed the idea, claiming it dismisses the sacrifices made during the Assam Movement. They argued that tolerating illegal migrants in Assam would only embolden cross-border infiltration and destabilise the state.
Some national parties, however, offered a more nuanced take, suggesting that migration must be addressed through humanitarian and developmental frameworks rather than rhetoric. They noted that while security concerns are valid, migrants often flee poverty, climate change, or persecution, and policies must consider these factors.
Nonetheless, for Assamese groups, the focus remains on protecting their rights as promised in the Assam Accord. The remark was therefore seen as insensitive to historical struggles.
Illegal migrants in Assam: security and identity concerns
The issue is not merely cultural. Security experts warn that unchecked illegal migration can lead to law and order challenges. Border districts in Assam have frequently reported incidents of human trafficking, smuggling, and illegal land occupation. These add to the perception that migrants are not just outsiders but a direct risk to peace and stability.
Demographic changes also raise concerns about political representation. Many Assamese groups believe illegal migrants in Assam influence electoral outcomes, altering the balance of power in certain constituencies. Such fears have consistently shaped the state’s politics, leading to demands for stricter border control and verification mechanisms.
The remark, “Bangladeshi aaye to kya hua,” therefore clashes with these realities, explaining why it triggered strong backlash across the region.
The NRC and continuing challenges
In recent years, the National Register of Citizens (NRC) process was carried out in Assam to identify illegal migrants. Though aimed at providing clarity, the process created new controversies. Several people were left out due to documentation issues, while many alleged illegal migrants managed to remain on the list.
The NRC exercise demonstrated how deeply embedded the issue of illegal migrants in Assam is within daily life. For many, the remark by the ex-Planning Commission member appears to dismiss the struggles that Assamese people have endured to ensure their identity remains protected.
Civil society responses
Civil society groups and student organisations in Assam were quick to denounce the remark. They emphasised that casual statements about illegal migrants trivialise the sacrifices made by those who fought for the Assam Accord. Many demanded a formal clarification or apology from the ex-Planning Commission member.
Some academics, however, called for a balanced view. They argued that while the concerns of Assamese people are valid, policymakers must also address migration through developmental solutions. Instead of simply criminalising migrants, efforts should focus on border management, sustainable resource allocation, and humanitarian assistance where needed.
Broader implications for the Northeast
The debate over illegal migrants in Assam also affects other Northeastern states. Many states in the region have expressed concern about demographic changes due to migration. The Shillong meeting of political leaders in past years and the recent voices from Nagaland, Tripura, and Meghalaya highlight how widespread the issue is.
The remark by the ex-Planning Commission member has therefore not only stirred Assam but also sparked discussions across the Northeast. Leaders are now debating how to balance inclusivity with identity preservation, and how to implement long-term solutions for migration-related challenges.
The statement, “Bangladeshi aaye to kya hua,” by an ex-Planning Commission member has once again placed the spotlight on illegal migrants in Assam. While some interpret it as a call for inclusivity, most Assamese groups see it as an affront to their identity and history. The remark has sparked political debate, civil society protests, and renewed focus on one of India’s most sensitive migration issues.
As the controversy unfolds, the larger challenge remains: balancing humanitarian considerations with the need to protect Assam’s cultural and political identity. The debate on illegal migrants in Assam is far from over, and this remark has only reignited passions in a state where migration is more than just a demographic concern—it is a matter of existence.