Agartala, Aug 21, 2025:
Tipra Motha Party (TMP) founder Pradyot Kishore Manikya Debbarma strongly criticized a senior political leader over remarks linking the passage of the 125th Constitutional Amendment Bill to political power in the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (TTAADC). He dismissed the claim as “foolish” and “misleading,” stressing that leaders should first understand the Constitution before making such statements.
Pradyot Responds to Controversial Remark
The controversy began when a senior political figure suggested that the 125th Amendment Bill, which holds crucial implications for tribal autonomy, would only be passed if a particular party gained control in the TTAADC. Pradyot reacted sharply, saying that such comments show a lack of constitutional knowledge and risk misleading the indigenous population of Tripura.
Speaking on social media, the TMP chief said, “The 125th Amendment is a constitutional matter. It has nothing to do with who wins or loses in the TTAADC. Leaders should read the Constitution before confusing the people with false promises.”
Background of the 125th Amendment Bill
The 125th Constitutional Amendment Bill was introduced to strengthen the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which governs tribal areas in the Northeast. The bill proposes more financial and administrative powers for the autonomous councils, including the TTAADC.
If passed, the amendment would give councils greater control over resources, land management, and development planning. This has made the bill a significant issue in Tripura politics, where the tribal population continues to demand more autonomy and recognition of their rights.
Political War of Words
Pradyot accused rival leaders of twisting constitutional matters to gain political mileage ahead of local elections. He said such “careless statements” not only insult the intelligence of voters but also weaken the struggle for genuine constitutional rights.
“Leaders must stop using tribal issues as election slogans. The indigenous people of Tripura deserve honesty, not confusion,” Pradyot stated.
He further urged people to remain cautious of “false narratives” and focus instead on real constitutional safeguards that affect their future.
Call for Unity and Awareness
The TMP founder emphasized that tribal unity and awareness remain essential for ensuring the successful implementation of the 125th Amendment Bill. He called upon youth, community leaders, and civil society groups to study the Constitution and demand accountability from politicians.
“Only by being aware can we safeguard our rights. No single party can claim ownership of the Constitution. It belongs to the people,” he added.
Larger Implications for Tripura
The debate around the 125th Amendment has grown more intense in recent months as tribal politics in Tripura gains momentum. The TTAADC elections, expected in the near future, are seen as a critical battleground for both state and regional parties.
Political observers note that misleading claims around constitutional amendments could deepen mistrust among the tribal population. Analysts suggest that clarity on the bill and its implementation will be vital to building confidence and preventing unrest.
Call to Action
Pradyot’s comments have sparked fresh discussion across Tripura about the need for political accountability and constitutional awareness. His statement also resonates with growing concerns about misinformation in political campaigns.
As the state prepares for upcoming elections, the 125th Amendment Bill will likely remain at the center of debates. Citizens are now being urged to fact-check political claims and demand transparency from their leaders.