The Tripura High Court has directed the state government to allow immediate transportation of rescued cattle to Jharkhand. The Court criticized authorities for blocking transit and termed the delay as harmful to animal welfare.
Read More: Tripura Reopens Old Murder Cases: CM Manik Saha Update
Key Facts
- Court: Tripura High Court
- Judge: T Amarnath Goud
- Petitioner: Dhyan Foundation
- Cattle Count: Around 2,100 in Tripura
- Destination: Jharkhand
- Legal Issue: Denial of transit permits
- Court Order: Immediate issuance of permits and assistance
Court Directs Immediate Action
The Tripura High Court issued strict directions to the state government during a recent hearing. Justice T Amarnath Goud instructed authorities to grant transit permits without delay.
Additionally, the Court ordered officials to provide full support for transporting the cattle to Jharkhand. The bench emphasized that the State cannot block lawful inter-state movement of animals.
State’s Stand Faces Strong Criticism
During the hearing, the State defended its decision to deny transportation. However, the Court rejected these arguments and raised serious concerns.
It pointed out that authorities refused to provide fodder due to high costs. At the same time, they prevented relocation to a place with cheaper resources.
Therefore, the Court questioned the logic behind the State’s position. It also asked whether the government could manage the growing number of cattle.
Concerns Over Cost and Infrastructure
The Court highlighted the high cost of fodder in Tripura. Officials reportedly cited prices of around ₹24.70 per kilogram.
In contrast, other states offer fodder at much lower rates. As a result, the petitioner argued that relocation would reduce financial strain.
Moreover, the Court asked whether the State would bear long-term maintenance costs. The government’s uncertain response drew sharp remarks from the bench.
Legal Objections to State’s Proposal
The State suggested distributing cattle among private individuals. However, the Court dismissed this proposal.
It clarified that such distribution lacks legal backing under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Rules, 2017. Furthermore, the bench raised concerns about animal safety.
Given the risk of cattle smuggling to Bangladesh, the Court warned that such steps could endanger the animals.
Petitioner Highlights Welfare Concerns
Representing Dhyan Foundation, Advocate Harish Pandya argued that relocation is necessary. He stated that the State introduced new claims during the hearing.
Consequently, the Court questioned the inconsistency in the State’s submissions.
The foundation currently manages about 2,100 rescued cattle in Tripura. Meanwhile, its gaushala in Jharkhand houses nearly 22,000 animals.
Court Calls Delay ‘Cruelty’
After reviewing all arguments, the Court ruled in favor of immediate relocation. It stated that forcing cattle to remain in current conditions amounts to cruelty.
Additionally, any delay in transportation would worsen their situation. Therefore, the bench ordered authorities to ensure smooth and quick transit.
Q&A Section
Q1: What did the Tripura High Court order?
The Court ordered immediate issuance of transit permits for cattle transportation to Jharkhand.
Q2: Who filed the petition?
Dhyan Foundation filed the petition.
Q3: Why did the State oppose transportation?
The State cited high fodder costs and logistical concerns.
Q4: What was the Court’s response?
The Court rejected the arguments and called the delay cruel to animals.
Location Context
Tripura shares an international border and faces challenges like cattle smuggling. Therefore, proper regulation and humane handling of rescued animals remain crucial for the region.
Also Read: Sikkim Municipal Polls 2026: Big High-Stakes Vote Set for April 24 – Prime 24 Seven