In the world of law, victories are often defined not just by the judgment delivered, but by the courage, resilience, and determination of the advocates who fight for truth. Advocate Mita Banerjee, a tireless defender of justice and a strong voice for the voiceless, recently secured a landmark victory in the Calcutta High Court in the case of Somnath Biswal vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. (WPA 18038 of 2025).

This case, heard before Justice Tirthankar Ghosh on 18th August 2025, revolved around serious allegations of financial misappropriation at the Asansol Club Limited. What makes this victory even more remarkable is that Advocate Mita Banerjee not only fought with clarity and conviction but also stood tall against some of the most senior and reputed advocates of the State—proving that determination and legal acumen can triumph over influence and stature.

The Background of the Case

The petitioner, Somnath Biswal, who served as the President of the Asansol Club Limited, raised concerns regarding alleged misappropriation and defalcation amounting to nearly ₹4.81 crores. Despite formally informing the Officer-in-Charge of Hirapur Police Station and later escalating the matter to senior police officials, no First Information Report (FIR) was registered.

Faced with administrative silence, the petitioner approached the Calcutta High Court. Advocate Mita Banerjee, representing the petitioner, meticulously argued that the failure of the police authorities to act violated the principles laid down in the landmark Supreme Court case of Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2008) 14 SCC 337, which makes it mandatory for the police to register an FIR in case of a cognizable offence.

The Opposition: A Battle Against Senior Legal Stalwarts

On the other side, the State was represented by Mr. Kishore Dutta, Learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Suman Sengupta, Senior Government Advocate, along with a battery of lawyers including Mr. Syed Nazmul Hossain.

Additionally, the Asansol Club Limited was defended by well-known advocates such as Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty, Mr. Apalak Basu, Mr. Kallol Saha, and Mr. Akash Ghosh.

It was clear that the opposition was formidable. Yet, Advocate Mita Banerjee preparation, presence of mind, and unshakable belief in her client’s cause helped her navigate the pressure of arguing against senior advocates with years of courtroom experience.

Courtroom Triumph

In a decisive turn of events, Advocate Mita Banerjee emerged victorious as she dismantled the State’s defence with precision and conviction. While the State argued that a Scrutiny Committee had already reviewed the accounts and found irregularities, and that an internal police enquiry found no cognizable offence, Advocate Mita Banerjee powerfully reminded the Court that no procedural shield can silence a citizen’s right to justice.

With unwavering advocacy, she asserted that when allegations involving misappropriation of crores of rupees arise, the law mandates active police intervention, not passive observation.

Her compelling arguments turned the tide in favour of the petitioner, leading the Court to uphold that despite the police’s reluctance, the petitioner retains full right to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

The courtroom resonated with a sense of justice restored — a victory for due process, determination, and the rule of law.

The Verdict: A Step Toward Justice

The Court, while disposing of the matter, directed that the Enquiry Officer communicate his report to the petitioner within seven days, granting transparency and accountability. Justice Ghosh’s order ensured that the petitioner retained the right to seek remedies through the Magistrate’s court—keeping the pursuit of justice alive.

While some may consider the order a procedural direction, for Advocate Mita Banerjee , this was a significant victory. It reaffirmed the petitioner’s right to be heard, ensured the case did not vanish into administrative files, and showcased the strength of a well-prepared advocate who stood fearlessly against senior counterparts.

Why This Victory Matters

Every legal battle tells a larger story. For Advocate Mita Banerjee , this win is not just about one case—it is a reflection of her larger mission as an advocate. She has always stood for justice, transparency, and fairness, often fighting for those who feel powerless against systems of influence.

Winning against senior and reputed advocates in a high-profile matter sends out a strong message: justice is not about power, but about truth and perseverance.

AIR Online Judgment Summary: Somnath Biswal v. State of West Bengal (WPA 18038/2025)

The Calcutta High Court, in Somnath Biswal v. State of West Bengal (WPA 18038/2025), dealt with a petition by the former President of Asansol Club alleging a financial fraud of ₹4.81 crores. Despite reporting to the police, no FIR was registered as authorities found no cognizable offence. Justice Tirthankar Ghosh directed the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the BNSS, 2023, for appropriate action. The Court also ordered that the police share the enquiry report with the petitioner within seven days.

Advocate Mita Banerjee: A Voice for the Voiceless

Beyond this case Advocate Mita Banerjee has earned recognition for her tireless efforts in promoting human rights, social justice, and fairness in law. Through her platform “Advocate for Voiceless”, she continues to amplify the struggles of those who are often ignored by mainstream legal and social systems.

Her philosophy is simple yet powerful: Law must serve the people, not intimidate them.

A Rising Star in Indian Legal Arena

This victory has cemented Advocate Mita Banerjee reputation as a rising star in the legal fraternity. While senior advocates command respect through years of experience, it is refreshing to witness young, passionate lawyers like her take bold stands and secure justice for their clients.

Her ability to argue fearlessly, backed by thorough research and clarity of thought, sets an inspiring example for the next generation of lawyers, especially women advocates who continue to break barriers in a traditionally male-dominated field.

Conclusion

The story of Advocate Mita Banerjee recent courtroom triumph is more than just a legal update—it is an inspiration. It reflects how a determined advocate can challenge entrenched power structures, uphold constitutional rights, and set new benchmarks for justice.

In the end, her victory is not just personal; it is a win for every citizen who believes in fairness, accountability, and the enduring power of law.

As she continues her journey, one thing is certain—Advocate Mita Banerjee is not just fighting cases, she is building a legacy of courage and justice for generations to come.