Angami students in Kohima have voiced their concerns over the appointment of staff for the Supportive Action for Knowledge and Holistic Initiatives (SAKHI) program, expressing reservations about the selection process. The apprehensions raised by the students underscore the importance of transparent and fair procedures in such crucial appointments.
The Angami students’ concern centers around the perceived lack of inclusivity and fairness in the staff selection process for the SAKHI program. They emphasize the need for a thorough and unbiased approach to ensure that individuals chosen for these roles possess the requisite qualifications and can effectively contribute to the program’s objectives.
The issue has sparked discussions among the student community, with calls for a reevaluation of the staff appointment process to address the raised concerns. Also, the students stress the significance of ensuring that appointments are made based on merit, expertise, and a fair assessment of the candidates’ abilities to fulfill the responsibilities associated with the SAKHI program.
This expression of concern highlights the students’ commitment to upholding the principles of fairness and accountability in educational and developmental initiatives. Further, the SAKHI program, aimed at holistic development and knowledge initiatives, plays a pivotal role in shaping the educational landscape, making it imperative for the staff appointments to be conducted with utmost transparency.
More About It
As discussions continue, the hope is that the concerns raised by the Angami students will be heeded, and measures will be taken to address any perceived shortcomings in the staff appointment process. The transparency and fairness of such processes are crucial not only for the success of the SAKHI program but also for fostering a sense of trust and confidence among the student community and stakeholders.
Moreover, the concerns raised by Angami students in Kohima regarding the staff appointment process for the SAKHI program highlight the importance of transparent and fair practices in educational initiatives. The students’ advocacy for a thorough evaluation and reexamination of the process reflects a commitment to upholding the principles of meritocracy and ensuring the success of developmental programs in the region.
