The Assam gobi farming remark posted by a state minister on 16 November 2025 has triggered intense backlash across India. The reference, which is tied to a historical massacre from the Partition era, drew widespread criticism from political leaders, civil society, and thousands of social media users. The remark has now become one of the most discussed issues in the region, raising questions about responsible communication by public figures.
The controversy escalated further when Shashi Tharoor publicly criticized the post, calling it “unjustifiable and deeply insensitive”. The issue has since dominated social media, sparking conversations about responsible communication by public officials, communal sensitivity, and the role of historical memory in politics.
Assam Gobi Farming Remark and Its Controversial Historical Meaning
The term “gobi farming” might sound harmless on the surface, but it carries violent historical associations. It has been used in certain extremist narratives to describe targeted killings during the Partition period.
When the Assam minister referenced the phrase in what appeared to be a political comment, many interpreted it as an endorsement or trivialization of historical violence.
Public Reaction on Social Media
Within hours of the post appearing online:
- Thousands of users condemned the remark.
- Hashtags like #InsensitiveRemark and #ResponsibleLeadership started trending.
- Several social media users demanded a formal apology from the minister.
Platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook became battlegrounds of heated debates, with many reminding that political leaders must exercise caution while referring to historical tragedies.
Shashi Tharoor Responds Strongly
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor was among the first national leaders to react.
In a detailed post, Tharoor wrote:
“As a proud Hindu, I neither justify nor condone any form of massacre. Our nationalism does not require violence, nor does our faith endorse such acts.”
He emphasized that the minister’s remark was not acceptable in a democratic, multicultural nation, adding that leaders must avoid invoking references that can deepen fault lines.
Tharoor’s response gained significant traction online, with thousands sharing and commenting in agreement.
Assam Government Maintains Silence
Despite the uproar, the Assam government has not issued an official statement on the controversy.
Political analysts believe the silence may be strategic, as responding publicly could either escalate tension or create divisions within the party.
Opposition Parties Demand Apology
Opposition groups in Assam, particularly the Congress and AIUDF, demanded:
- A public apology from the minister
- Clarity on why a government representative would use such language
- Assurance that similar comments will not be made in the future
One local Congress leader called the remark “a dangerous attempt to normalize violent historical rhetoric.”
Impact on Assam’s Political Climate
The controversy comes at a sensitive time for Assam, where identity politics and communal tensions have long shaped public discourse.
Political commentators fear the remark could:
- Deepen social polarisation
- Fuel mistrust among communities
- Distract from key governance issues such as employment, infrastructure, and border security
Some academics also argue that invoking historical violence, even indirectly, undermines ongoing peace-building efforts in several northeastern regions.
Citizens Call for More Responsible Leadership
Organisations, student bodies, and civil society groups expressed concern that the remark could set a dangerous precedent if left unchecked.
Many users on social media urged the Assam government to introduce:
- Clear communication guidelines for ministers
- Mandatory training on sensitive historical topics
- Awareness campaigns to prevent misuse of historically painful references
What Happens Next?
Legal experts note that while the remark may not fall under direct criminal offence, it could still be challenged under public harmony and speech ethics guidelines.
Political observers believe the minister may eventually issue a clarification or delete the post, especially if pressure continues to mount.
For now, public criticism continues to grow as citizens across India demand accountability and responsible communication from political leaders.
Final View — Why This Matters
This incident highlights a crucial issue:
Words used by public figures can influence public sentiment, especially when tied to historical violence.
The “gobi farming” remark serves as a reminder that:
- Historical tragedies must be approached sensitively
- Political communication must avoid inflammatory language
- Citizens expect leaders to uphold the highest standards of responsibility
READ MORE: Fire Tragedy in Bharalumukh Guwahati Claims Couple