The suspension of two opposition MLAs from the ongoing winter session of the Assam Assembly was revoked on Thursday by Speaker Biswajit Daimary. Marking a significant shift in the tense political atmosphere that had dominated the House over the past few days. The decision came just a day before the five-day sitting was set to conclude. Prompting relief across both ruling and opposition benches. Leaders from several parties had approached the Speaker earlier in the day, urging him to reconsider the disciplinary action for the sake of smooth legislative functioning. Their intervention played a key role in resolving the standoff that had threatened to overshadow the remaining business of the session.
Background to the Suspension
The MLAs were suspended earlier in the week following heated exchanges inside the House, during which they were accused of disregarding rules and interrupting proceedings. The Speaker had justified the suspension by citing a need to maintain order, especially during crucial debates on governance and development issues. The move, however, was strongly criticised by opposition parties, who argued that dissent and deliberation were core elements of a healthy democracy. They claimed the suspension was disproportionate and risked silencing elected voices at a time when key policies were being discussed.
The issue quickly escalated into a political flashpoint. Several opposition members staged brief protests and demanded the suspension be reconsidered before the session ended. Their repeated appeals eventually prompted the Speaker to initiate discussions with House leaders, paving the way for a resolution.
Appeals from House Leaders Prompt Reversal
Following a round of dialogue involving senior MLAs from both sides, the Speaker agreed to withdraw the suspension orders. According to legislative sources, multiple leaders emphasised that the presence of all elected members was necessary to complete the final discussions scheduled for the winter session. They also argued that disciplinary actions, while necessary at times, should not hinder the broader objectives of the Assembly.
Speaker Daimary stated that the revocation was taken in the interest of preserving the cooperative spirit of the House. He reiterated the importance of discipline but acknowledged the need to give space for all representatives to contribute. The decision was welcomed across the Assembly. With several members calling it a positive step toward restoring normalcy after days of heightened tension.
Opposition Welcomes the Decision
Opposition parties expressed satisfaction with the Speaker’s move, describing it as a victory for democratic dialogue. They noted that disagreements are natural inside the Assembly but should be addressed through debate rather than punitive measures. Leaders from the opposition further stated that they looked forward to participating in the remaining discussions without the cloud of confrontation.
A few members also pointed out that the incident highlighted the need for clearer guidelines regarding conduct within the House. They stressed that while discipline is essential. Space must remain for strong arguments, criticism, and disagreement core components of any functioning legislature.
Ruling Bench Supports Smooth Session Closure
Members of the ruling coalition also supported the decision, stating that it would help the session conclude on a harmonious and productive note. They highlighted that the final day included important legislative items that required active participation from all sides. The coalition leaders expressed hope that members would maintain decorum while engaging in robust debates on policies affecting the state.
They also remarked that the withdrawal of the suspension underlined the Speaker’s commitment to protecting the dignity of the House while ensuring practical functioning. With the MLAs back in the chamber, the Assembly prepared to address pending bills, discussions, and policy debates without delay.
Broader Political Significance
Political observers noted that the incident reflects rising assertiveness within both the ruling. And opposition benches as Assam heads into another year of key administrative decisions. The suspension and subsequent revocation showed both the friction and the flexibility present within the state’s legislative framework. Analysts also pointed out that such incidents often reveal deeper political strategies, especially in sessions where sensitive issues are up for debate.
Despite the tensions, the quick resolution was seen as a healthy sign. It demonstrated that dialogue among leaders could override confrontation, preserving the institutional balance required for democratic governance. The return of the MLAs enabled the House to shift its focus back to development priorities and governance issues that impact the people of Assam.
A Call for Constructive Legislative Conduct
The revocation of the suspension serves as a reminder of the crucial role that decorum and dialogue play in sustaining a democratic legislature. With the winter session nearing its end. Both ruling and opposition sides expressed the need for better coordination in the upcoming sittings. They emphasised that while debates may be intense. Maintaining respect for procedural norms ensures that the Assembly functions without disruption.
Citizens following the developments can expect the final day of the session to move forward without further conflict. The Speaker’s decision ultimately reinforced the importance of cooperation within the Assembly. Ensuring that representative governance remains at the core of Assam’s political process.