The historic Dighalipukhuri, one of Guwahati’s most iconic landmarks, has become the center of a heated public protest. Local citizens, environmentalists, and heritage activists have raised strong objections to the proposed extension of the flyover near the area, fearing that the construction could damage the lake’s ecosystem and alter its cultural landscape. The protests have gained significant momentum as residents urge the Assam government to halt the project and explore alternative plans that safeguard the site’s heritage.
Read More: Mizoram Government Warns Against NH-306 Blockade
Dighalipukhuri, located in the heart of Guwahati, is not just a picturesque water body but a centuries-old landmark believed to date back to the Ahom era. Over time, it has served as a crucial recreational and cultural hub, symbolizing the city’s historical identity. However, the proposed flyover extension from Guwahati Club towards the Latasil area has sparked concerns among citizens who believe the project will permanently scar this heritage site.
The protest began with small gatherings organized by local resident associations, which quickly grew into a larger movement involving environmental NGOs, students, and cultural groups. On Sunday, hundreds of citizens assembled near Dighalipukhuri with placards reading “Save Dighalipukhuri” and “No Flyover on Our Heritage.” The demonstrators demanded that the government immediately stop all construction activities near the lake’s boundaries.
According to the protesters, the ongoing piling work and machinery movements have already affected the water quality and disturbed the natural habitat of migratory birds. Environmental experts warn that the construction could lead to the shrinking of the lake’s area and destroy its ecological balance. The All Assam Environment Protection Forum stated that such urban projects must undergo detailed environmental impact assessments before approval.
Heritage activists also voiced their concerns over the diminishing respect for Guwahati’s historical sites. “Dighalipukhuri is not just a lake; it’s part of the city’s soul,” said local activist Dr. Bidisha Sarmah. “We are not against development, but progress should not come at the cost of heritage destruction.” She urged authorities to adopt a more sustainable urban planning approach that integrates conservation and infrastructure development.
The Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority (GMDA), which oversees the project, defended the flyover plan, stating that it aims to ease traffic congestion in the busy Latasil and Guwahati Club junctions. Officials assured that the construction will not directly affect the lake and that measures are being taken to prevent any ecological harm. “We are following all necessary environmental protocols and keeping a safe buffer distance from the lake,” said a GMDA official.
However, residents remain skeptical. They claim that past promises of ecological protection during infrastructure projects were often broken. Many pointed to examples such as the shrinking of Bharalu river channels and the loss of green cover in the Chandmari area due to unplanned urban expansion. The growing distrust between citizens and local authorities has further fueled the intensity of the protests.
Cultural organizations have also joined the movement, emphasizing the artistic and historical significance of Dighalipukhuri. For decades, the area has hosted public performances, art exhibitions, and boating festivals, making it a living symbol of Guwahati’s identity. Artists have been sharing sketches, poems, and songs online under the hashtag #SaveDighalipukhuri, amplifying the campaign’s reach across social media.
The protests have drawn political attention too. Opposition leaders have accused the ruling government of ignoring heritage conservation laws and rushing the project for electoral gain. In response, Assam’s Urban Development Minister stated that the government is open to dialogue with concerned citizens and experts to address the issue. “We are willing to listen to all sides and make modifications if necessary,” he said.
Urban planners argue that Guwahati needs a long-term master plan that balances modernization with environmental sensitivity. Experts recommend exploring alternatives like underground passages, rerouting traffic, or developing satellite roads to reduce congestion without disturbing cultural sites. They also suggested transforming Dighalipukhuri into an eco-heritage zone with stricter protection laws.
The citizens’ movement has also received support from environmental activists across the Northeast. Groups from Shillong, Itanagar, and Agartala expressed solidarity, highlighting how unchecked urbanization threatens cultural landmarks across the region. The Northeast Green Forum called for regional collaboration to promote sustainable urban design and preserve shared heritage.
As public pressure mounts, the Guwahati Municipal Corporation has reportedly paused some construction activities for review. A technical committee is expected to assess whether the flyover extension violates any environmental or heritage preservation norms. The committee’s findings, likely to be released next month, could decide the future of the controversial project.
For now, the citizens remain determined to protect what they see as the last green and cultural sanctuary in Guwahati’s rapidly modernizing landscape. “We want development that coexists with nature and culture, not one that erases them,” said protester Raktim Kalita. The voices around Dighalipukhuri echo a larger sentiment shared by many Indian cities—how to grow without losing their history.
Read More: Mamata Orders Quick Repair of Flood-Damaged Schools in North Bengal