The Congress has leveled serious allegations against the Manipur government, accusing it of making an illicit payment of Rs 6 crore to a Kuki militant outfit in violation of established norms. The controversy has stirred a political storm in the state, with the opposition demanding transparency and accountability from Chief Minister N. Biren Singh’s administration.
The Allegations
At a press conference in Imphal, Congress spokespersons claimed that the Manipur government had transferred Rs 6 crore to a Kuki armed group currently under a suspension of operations (SoO) agreement with the state and central governments. The Congress asserted that the payment was made without following due procedures, raising questions about the legitimacy and purpose of the transaction.
“This payment is highly irregular and violates the guidelines of the SoO agreement,” said Congress leader Govindas Konthoujam. “The government must explain why such a large sum was transferred and for what purpose.”
The opposition has also questioned whether the payment could further exacerbate tensions in a state already grappling with ethnic and communal conflicts.
What is the SoO Agreement?
The Suspension of Operations (SoO) agreement is a tripartite pact between the central government, the state government, and various militant groups in the northeast. The agreement is aimed at reducing violence and creating a conducive environment for peace talks. Under the SoO framework, militant groups agree to suspend their armed activities, and in return, they receive stipends and logistical support for their cadres.
However, any financial assistance provided under the SoO agreement is subject to strict scrutiny and must follow established norms. The Congress has alleged that the payment in question was made outside these norms, undermining the agreement’s credibility.
Congress’s Demands
The Congress has called for an independent investigation into the alleged payment, urging both the state and central governments to come clean on the issue.
“We demand a high-level inquiry to determine the reasons behind this payment and to identify those responsible for bypassing norms,” said Congress leader Jairam Ramesh. “The people of Manipur deserve transparency and accountability from their government.”
The party has also demanded a detailed audit of funds disbursed under the SoO agreement to ensure that public money is not being misused.
State Government’s Response
The Manipur government has yet to issue a formal response to the allegations. However, sources within the administration have hinted that the payment was part of routine financial assistance under the SoO agreement. They argue that such payments are necessary to maintain peace and prevent militant groups from resuming armed activities.
Despite these claims, the lack of transparency surrounding the transaction has fueled suspicions. Critics have pointed out that the timing of the payment—amid ongoing ethnic tensions between the Kuki and Meitei communities—raises further questions about the government’s intent.
Political Repercussions
The allegations have added fuel to the political fire in Manipur, where the BJP-led government has faced criticism for its handling of ethnic conflicts and governance issues. The Congress has seized the opportunity to attack the ruling party, accusing it of mismanagement and favoritism.
“This is yet another example of the BJP government’s failure to uphold the rule of law and its bias in dealing with certain groups,” said a senior Congress leader. “Such actions only deepen divisions and undermine peace efforts.”
Meanwhile, civil society organizations and activists have joined the chorus of criticism, demanding greater oversight of government dealings with militant groups. Some have warned that the controversy could derail ongoing peace efforts and further destabilize the region.
Implications for Peace in Manipur
Manipur’s fragile peace depends heavily on the effective implementation of agreements like the SoO. Any breach of trust or misuse of funds could have far-reaching consequences, potentially reigniting violence and eroding faith in the peace process.
Observers have called for a balanced approach that prioritizes transparency and accountability while ensuring that legitimate grievances of all communities are addressed. “The government must tread carefully and ensure that its actions do not inadvertently escalate tensions,” said a political analyst.
What Lies Ahead
As the controversy unfolds, all eyes are on the Manipur government’s next steps. Will it provide a satisfactory explanation for the alleged payment? Or will the matter escalate into a full-blown political crisis?
For now, the Congress’s allegations have put the spotlight on the need for greater oversight and accountability in handling agreements with militant groups. In a state as complex and volatile as Manipur, every decision carries significant implications for peace and stability.
