“Our probe is different from Singapore’s,” Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said while responding to questions on the Zubeen Garg case, drawing a clear distinction between the investigation being carried out in Assam and proceedings initiated abroad. The Chief Minister stressed that the state government’s inquiry follows Indian laws and procedures and should not be compared with any action taken by authorities in Singapore.
Read More: SHGs Strengthening Rural Economy in Tripura: Minister Ratan Lal Nath
Moreover, Himanta Biswa Sarma said jurisdiction, legal framework, and scope differ significantly between the two probes. Therefore, he urged people not to mix the two processes or arrive at premature conclusions. His remarks came amid public discussion and speculation surrounding the case involving popular Assamese singer Zubeen Garg.
Our probe is different from Singapore’s, says Himanta
Clarifying the government’s position, Himanta Biswa Sarma said the Assam administration is acting strictly within its legal mandate. “Our probe is different from Singapore’s,” he reiterated, adding that each country follows its own laws and investigative mechanisms.
According to the Chief Minister, the Assam government cannot rely on or replicate the procedures of another country. Instead, it must proceed based on evidence, complaints, and legal provisions applicable in India. Therefore, he emphasised that comparisons between the two investigations are misleading.
Focus on jurisdiction and legal process
Himanta said the key difference lies in jurisdiction. While Singaporean authorities act under their domestic laws, the Assam government must follow Indian law. Hence, the scope, speed, and nature of the probe will naturally vary.
He also pointed out that the state’s investigation focuses on aspects that fall within its authority. “We will look into what is legally relevant here,” he said, making it clear that the probe will remain confined to facts and evidence available under Indian jurisdiction.
Assam government rules out external influence
Addressing concerns about pressure or external influence, the Chief Minister said the state probe would remain independent. He asserted that no foreign investigation would dictate the course of action in Assam.
Moreover, Himanta Biswa Sarma said due process must be respected. He added that investigations cannot be driven by public sentiment or social media narratives. Therefore, “our probe is different from Singapore’s” also means that the Assam government will not rush or bypass legal safeguards.
Public reactions and growing debate
The Zubeen Garg case has generated widespread discussion in Assam, given the singer’s popularity and cultural influence. Many supporters and critics have expressed views on social media and public platforms.
However, the Chief Minister cautioned against trial by media. He said public opinion should not interfere with legal proceedings. As a result, he urged people to allow the investigation to run its course without speculation.
Balancing accountability and fairness
Himanta Biswa Sarma said the government remains committed to accountability but will also ensure fairness. He stated that every individual is entitled to due process, regardless of public stature.
“Our probe is different from Singapore’s,” he said again, stressing that the goal is not to sensationalise the issue but to examine facts objectively. According to him, fairness strengthens the credibility of any investigation.
Government’s stand on transparency
The Chief Minister said the Assam government will maintain transparency within legal limits. However, he clarified that not every detail of an ongoing probe can be made public.
He added that premature disclosure could affect the investigation. Therefore, updates would be shared only when appropriate. This approach, he said, aligns with legal norms and protects the integrity of the process.
Political and legal implications
Observers note that Himanta’s remarks aim to draw a clear boundary between domestic governance and international developments. By stating that “our probe is different from Singapore’s,” the Chief Minister has attempted to calm speculation and reinforce institutional autonomy.
Politically, the statement signals that the government does not wish the issue to escalate into a larger controversy. Legally, it underscores respect for jurisdictional limits and procedural discipline.
What lies ahead in the case
While the Assam government continues its probe, officials have not indicated a specific timeline. Himanta Biswa Sarma said investigations depend on evidence collection and verification.
He urged patience and restraint, reiterating that conclusions should come only after thorough examination. Ultimately, he said, the truth will emerge through lawful investigation, not comparison with foreign proceedings.
Overall, Himanta’s assertion that “our probe is different from Singapore’s” seeks to separate facts from speculation. By emphasising jurisdiction, due process, and fairness, the Assam Chief Minister has outlined the government’s approach to the Zubeen Garg case, urging the public to trust legal institutions and avoid premature judgments.
Read More: CRPF builds civil trust in Kangpokpi through civic drive