Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s recent statement regarding the Gandhi family’s priorities has sparked controversy and raised questions about the historical narratives embraced by different political entities in India. The assertion that the Gandhi family would choose to pay homage to Babur, the Mughal emperor, before Lord Ram, has ignited a heated debate on faith, politics, and the interpretation of history.
Sarma’s remarks were in response to the Congress party declining an invitation for the ‘Pran Pratishtha’ ceremony at the Ram Temple. According to Sarma, the decision to invite the Congress was a mistake, as he believes that only those who have faith in Lord Ram should have been invited. The statement goes beyond a mere political disagreement and delves into the realm of religious sentiments and affiliations.
The provocative assertion that the Gandhi family would offer obeisance to Babur before Lord Ram raises questions about the historical figures and events that shape the Indian political landscape. It reflects a clash of narratives – one rooted in the Hindu cultural and religious ethos centered around Lord Ram, and the other associated with the Mughal empire represented by Babur.
Sarma’s reference to the Gandhi family’s visit to the Babur Tomb in Afghanistan, particularly highlighting Rahul Gandhi’s visit in 2005, adds another layer to the controversy. The question of why there is purportedly so much hatred for Ram Lalla and why the Gandhi family would pay homage to Babur becomes a focal point. Sarma provocatively asks, “Why do you hate Hindus so much?” as he seeks to draw attention to the perceived historical and religious inclinations of the Gandhi family.
The controversy stirred by Himanta Biswa Sarma’s statements highlights the intricate interplay between politics, religion, and historical narratives in India. It underscores the importance of understanding and respecting diverse perspectives on history, especially when it comes to figures as significant as Lord Ram and Babur. As the nation grapples with these contrasting narratives, it becomes crucial to foster a dialogue that promotes mutual understanding and tolerance, steering clear of divisive rhetoric that may further polarize an already diverse society.
