In a major move toward resolving a long-standing issue, the Meghalaya government is set to finalize the relocation of 342 families from Harijan Colony by the end of this year. Urban Affairs Minister Sniawbhalang Dhar announced that a status report on the relocation process is ready, and a decision will be made by November or December 2024. This development comes after years of delays and discussions regarding the resettlement of the Harijan Colony residents, who have faced numerous challenges in their quest for relocation.
Status of Relocation Plans
The Urban Affairs Minister confirmed that government land has been allocated for the relocation, adhering to a blueprint that has been under discussion for some time. Amid ongoing deliberations, there is potential consideration of using defense land near Harijan Colony for this purpose. Minister Dhar emphasized the government’s commitment to following the blueprint for the relocation process, addressing the concerns of the Harijan Panchayat Committee (HPC) regarding past negligence of the issue.
Concerns from Harijan Panchayat Committee
The HPC has voiced its frustrations regarding the government’s handling of the relocation, highlighting feelings of neglect over the years. Gurjit Singh, secretary of the HPC, expressed discontent over the recent discussions about demolishing local places of worship, including a Gurdwara and a temple, a move he deemed unacceptable. This unexpected shift in focus from relocation to demolishing religious sites has further complicated the situation for the community.
The state government had initially proposed relocating the 342 families from Them Iew Mawlong to the Shillong Municipal Board premises on Bivar Road. To facilitate this move, the government agreed to provide 2.14 acres of land in addition to the 1.4 acres located opposite the Municipal Board’s building. However, the HPC has demanded that each family be allocated 200 square meters of land within the European Ward, emphasizing the need for the relocation to occur in an area that does not fall under the Sixth Schedule, which governs the administration of certain tribal areas in Northeast India.
Land Acquisition for Relocation
As part of an interim measure, the Meghalaya government has acquired 12,444.13 square meters of land in Harijan Colony. This acquisition was formalized through a tripartite lease deed signed in March 2021, involving the state government, the Syiem of Hima Mylliem (the local chief), and the Shillong Municipal Board. The government paid a one-time fee of Rs 2 crore to the Hima Mylliem for the land, aiming to provide a more permanent solution to the residents of Harijan Colony.
However, Chief Secretary DP Wahlang recently indicated that the government is considering a new proposal to allocate defense land adjacent to Harijan Colony for the relocation. This suggestion could alter the course of the relocation process, depending on the feasibility and approval of such a plan.
Challenges and Future Prospects
The relocation of Harijan Colony families is not just a logistical challenge; it involves addressing the social, cultural, and economic implications for the residents. The government’s commitment to finalizing this relocation by year-end is crucial for restoring confidence among the affected families. The HPC’s demands and concerns must also be considered to ensure that the resettlement is conducted fairly and equitably.
The resolution of this matter would mark a significant milestone for the Meghalaya government, showcasing its dedication to addressing the needs and rights of its citizens. It also highlights the importance of transparent communication and collaboration between the government and local communities in resolving contentious issues.
As the Meghalaya government prepares to finalize the relocation of 342 families from Harijan Colony, it faces both challenges and opportunities. The commitment to a timely resolution could pave the way for better living conditions for the residents, while the ongoing discussions regarding land use emphasize the need for sensitive and inclusive policy-making.
