Mizoram has reaffirmed its stance of using the 1875 notification as the reference point for its border with Assam. State Home Minister K Sapdanga recently declared that this historical document remains the legal and cultural basis for defining Mizoram’s boundary.
His statement comes at a time when both states continue to hold discussions to resolve the long-standing border issue. By maintaining this position, Mizoram seeks to protect its historical rights while calling for peaceful dialogue with Assam.
Read More: Dhubri SHG Women Get Rs 10,000 Aid for Empowerment
Why the 1875 Notification Matters in Assam Border Talks
The 1875 notification Assam border reference is not new in the dispute. It traces back to the British colonial period, when the notification was issued to separate the Lushai Hills (now Mizoram) from the Cachar plains in Assam.
Mizoram believes that this boundary best reflects the cultural and geographical identity of its people. Over time, land encroachments and administrative changes have caused disagreements. Yet, leaders in Mizoram continue to argue that the 1875 notification provides the fairest framework.
According to Sapdanga, deviating from this reference could harm Mizoram’s territorial integrity and weaken its historical claim.
Home Minister K Sapdanga on Mizoram’s Position
In his statement, Sapdanga stressed that Mizoram will not compromise on its demand to uphold the 1875 notification Assam border reference. He noted that the document was created after consultation with Mizo chiefs and communities during the colonial era.
This gives the notification special legitimacy in the eyes of the people of Mizoram. For them, the boundary is not only about land but also about identity, tradition, and respect for history.
Sapdanga also highlighted that Mizoram is open to dialogue. However, he insisted that talks must start from the 1875 notification as the foundation.
Assam’s Viewpoint in the Border Issue
While Mizoram maintains its claim, Assam often refers to the 1933 notification as a more accurate boundary marker. This difference in interpretation has led to repeated disputes over land ownership and jurisdiction.
The Assam government argues that administrative changes over time cannot be ignored. They say that relying only on the 1875 notification Assam border line does not reflect ground realities.
This clash of perspectives has been the main reason behind tensions along the border.
Need for Dialogue and Peaceful Settlement
Sapdanga emphasized that Mizoram prefers peaceful talks over confrontation. He called on both states to rely on dialogue, mutual respect, and central government support to find lasting solutions.
He also assured the people of Mizoram that the state government remains firm in defending their rights. At the same time, he underlined that violence will not help either state.
The appeal for peace is important, as past border clashes have resulted in injuries, damage, and loss of trust between communities living on both sides.
Historical Roots of the 1875 Notification Assam Border
The British government issued the 1875 notification after consultations with local leaders. It was intended to settle disputes between the Mizo people and neighboring communities in the Cachar plains.
Because of this participatory process, Mizoram considers the notification a fair and just solution. For many, it stands as proof that their ancestors had a say in shaping their boundary.
In contrast, the 1933 notification, which Assam prefers, was made without involving Mizo leaders. Mizoram argues this makes it less legitimate.
Central Government’s Role
The Union government has often stepped in to mediate border disputes between Assam and its neighbors, including Mizoram. Sapdanga expressed hope that New Delhi would recognize the validity of the 1875 notification Assam border reference.
By doing so, he believes the central government can help settle the dispute fairly while respecting Mizoram’s historical rights.
Delhi’s role remains vital, as both Assam and Mizoram are part of India’s strategic Northeast. Peace and stability in the region are crucial for development and security.
Impact on Local Communities
People living near the disputed areas are the most affected by the Assam-Mizoram border conflict. They face uncertainty over land ownership, fear of clashes, and restrictions on movement.
By using the 1875 notification Assam border as a reference, Mizoram aims to provide clarity and security to these communities. Sapdanga stressed that ensuring the safety and dignity of local residents remains a top priority.
Future of the Assam-Mizoram Border Talks
The way forward lies in continued discussions. Sapdanga reiterated that Mizoram is committed to dialogue, provided that the 1875 notification remains the baseline.
Experts believe that joint surveys, transparent talks, and active involvement of the central government could help bridge differences. Building trust among border communities will also be critical.
If both states can agree on a framework that respects history while addressing present needs, a long-lasting solution is possible.
Conclusion: Defending History, Promoting Peace
Mizoram’s decision to stick to the 1875 notification Assam border reference highlights its determination to defend historical and cultural identity. Home Minister K Sapdanga made it clear that while the state will not compromise on this demand, it also values dialogue and peace.
For Assam and Mizoram, the challenge now is to find common ground. If both states work together with support from the central government, the dispute can be resolved without further conflict.
In the end, the goal remains clear: to uphold history, protect communities, and promote harmony between neighbors.
Read More: Assam to Probe Inter-Faith Land Transfers, Says CM Himanta