Manipur Royal Palace IPS dispute discussions intensified after Rajya Sabha MP Leishemba Sanajaoba alleged that a senior IPS officer barged into his residential compound and threatened his security personnel. The claim emerged following Thursday’s scuffle between protesters opposing the Manipur Sangai Festival and security forces. Moreover, the incident added fresh tension to an already volatile situation, prompting sharp counterclaims from the police.
Manipur Royal Palace IPS Dispute Begins After Protest-Linked Clash
The Manipur Royal Palace IPS dispute began soon after demonstrations turned heated near the palace area. Protesters had opposed the state’s decision to hold the Sangai Festival amid ongoing ethnic tensions. During the chaos, one protester allegedly assaulted the IPS officer who was deployed to restore order.
According to the MP’s office, the officer then entered the palace compound without permission while pursuing the agitators. They said the officer confronted the palace guards, behaved aggressively, and issued threats. The MP’s team described the act as a serious breach of protocol, especially given the cultural significance of the Royal Palace, where Sanajaoba resides as the titular king of Manipur’s erstwhile royal family.
The MP’s office also stated that his guards only acted to protect the compound from intrusions caused by the protest-related commotion. They argued that the presence of an officer inside such a sensitive heritage property reflected a disregard for respect and established norms.
Police Deny Entry, Claim Guards Sheltered Protesters
The police issued a strong rebuttal soon after the allegation surfaced. Their statement added another layer to the Manipur Royal Palace IPS dispute. According to the department, the IPS officer never entered the palace premises and remained outside the restricted zone. Instead, they claimed that the MP’s guards hindered police efforts by sheltering protesters inside the compound.
The police further alleged that one of the protesters who entered the palace area had already assaulted the officer moments earlier. They said some guards refused to hand over the individual for questioning. Additionally, police officials stated that the officer attempted to explain the situation but received hostility instead of cooperation.
Their version contradicted the MP’s account, creating two sharply different narratives. Police leaders stressed that obstructing police operations during such sensitive moments can worsen public disorder. They also reaffirmed that no officer would intentionally disrespect a site of cultural importance.
Manipur Royal Palace IPS Dispute Fuels Statewide Debate
The Manipur Royal Palace IPS dispute quickly sparked debate among the public. Supporters of the MP argued that the Royal Palace must be treated with dignity and that entering the compound without proper communication shows poor judgment. They stressed that the palace is not just a residence but a symbol of Manipur’s heritage.
On the other hand, supporters of the police highlighted the complexity of the situation. They said that the officer was responding to a volatile protest scenario and needed cooperation from all sides. Some argued that allowing protesters to enter a protected compound could risk further escalation.
Social media platforms reflected a divided public mood. Several users demanded a neutral inquiry to determine whether the officer crossed into the premises or whether the MP’s guards overstepped their role in sheltering protesters.
Calls for Inquiry Grow as Tension Deepens
As speculation increased, community groups, legal experts, and civil bodies urged the government to launch an impartial inquiry. They said only factual verification would clarify whether the incident was a misunderstanding or a violation of protocol.
Some leaders warned against politicising the Manipur Royal Palace IPS dispute, noting that the state remains fragile. They encouraged both sides to show restraint and ensure that the disagreement does not inflame ongoing tensions.
Legal analysts also stated that the incident highlights the need for clearer guidelines governing interactions between security personnel and heritage sites, particularly during unrest. They said both law enforcement and private guards must prioritise communication to avoid misinterpretation.
Manipur Royal Palace IPS Dispute Reflects Fragile Trust
The Manipur Royal Palace IPS dispute underscores the fragile trust between institutions during a period of heightened sensitivity. Both the MP and the police insist they acted responsibly. Yet their versions remain sharply opposed.
Residents expressed concern that minor misunderstandings are escalating too quickly amid a charged atmosphere. Some urged the government to address underlying public frustrations that continue to fuel protests and confrontations.
As authorities prepare to review the incident, many hope for a balanced outcome that respects cultural heritage while upholding law-and-order responsibilities. The Manipur Royal Palace IPS dispute therefore highlights the urgent need for clear communication, cooperation, and careful handling during volatile times.
Read More: Smuggling Declines Sharply Along Mizoram Border