Tripura Congress MLA Urges CPI(M) Workers to Join Forces Against BJP

Congress MLA and former minister Sudip Roy Barman on Tuesday urged CPI(M) workers to align with the Congress, emphasizing the need for a united opposition to challenge the ruling BJP in Tripura. He addressed party workers and supporters, asserting that the CPI(M) had lost significant public backing and that their return to power seemed unlikely. He encouraged CPI(M) cadres to abandon their rigid political stance and support the Congress in the larger interest of democracy and governance.

Barman criticized the BJP-led administration for failing to deliver on its promises and accused the government of suppressing opposition voices. He claimed that the people of Tripura were growing disillusioned with the current regime, citing unemployment, inflation, and governance issues as key concerns. He argued that the BJP had betrayed public trust by failing to address these challenges effectively, making a strong opposition alliance the need of the hour.

The Congress leader also highlighted the political shift in Tripura, where traditional party loyalties had begun to weaken due to dissatisfaction with existing leadership. He suggested that CPI(M) workers who still sought a change in governance should recognize the Congress as the more viable alternative. He reminded them that political survival depended on adapting to the evolving sentiments of the people, rather than clinging to past ideologies.

Barman’s appeal to CPI(M) workers stirred reactions across the political spectrum. Some CPI(M) leaders dismissed his call, arguing that their party remained strong despite electoral setbacks. They insisted that the CPI(M) still had a dedicated base and was capable of independently countering the BJP’s influence. However, certain sections within the CPI(M) appeared open to discussion, acknowledging that the BJP’s dominance had altered the state’s political landscape.

Within the Congress, leaders welcomed Barman’s outreach, seeing it as a strategic move to consolidate the opposition vote. Senior Congress members supported the idea of a broader coalition to prevent BJP from securing another term. They believed that a combined front with CPI(M) workers joining forces with Congress supporters could significantly challenge the BJP in upcoming elections.

Political analysts observed that Barman’s statement reflected the larger trend of shifting alliances in Indian politics. With opposition parties exploring new strategies to counter BJP’s electoral machinery, the call for unity among ideologically distinct parties was becoming more common. Analysts noted that in states where the BJP had a strong presence, opposition parties had little choice but to work together if they wanted to mount a serious challenge.

The BJP, on the other hand, dismissed Barman’s remarks, claiming that both Congress and CPI(M) had become irrelevant in Tripura’s political scenario. BJP leaders argued that their governance had brought development and stability to the state and that opposition efforts to unite would not change public sentiment. They stated that the electorate had moved past the Congress-CPI(M) era and now favored the BJP’s vision for progress.

Despite BJP’s confidence, political tensions in Tripura continue to rise as parties position themselves for the next elections. Barman’s call for CPI(M) workers to align with Congress signals a new phase in Tripura’s politics, where traditional rivalries may give way to unexpected alliances. Whether CPI(M) workers will heed his appeal remains uncertain, but the move has undoubtedly sparked fresh discussions about opposition strategies in the state.