 chief Paresh Baruah.){kind=link}
The Jatiya Yuva Bahini, the youth wing of Raijor Dal, has sought an FIR against Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma over his recent remarks mentioning banned ULFA (Independent) chief Paresh Baruah. The organisation submitted the complaint at Dispur Police Station on July 11.
It alleged that the statement could create public confusion and appear to legitimise the image of a banned militant leader. It also requested an independent investigation under the UAPA and other applicable laws. Meanwhile, the Chief Minister and the Assam government have not issued an official response.
Read More: Tripura Youth Arrested with Heroin in Assam
Key Facts
- Location: Dispur, Guwahati, Assam
- Date: July 11
- Complainant: Jatiya Yuva Bahini (Raijor Dal youth wing)
- Against: Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma
- Issue: Remarks referring to ULFA (Independent) chief Paresh Baruah
- Laws Mentioned: UAPA, 1967 and BNS, 2023
- Status: Complaint filed; investigation requested
Complaint Filed at Dispur Police Station
Jatiya Yuva Bahini has requested police to register an FIR against Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma.
According to the organisation, it submitted the complaint at Dispur Police Station on July 11. It also requested a fair and independent investigation into the Chief Minister’s remarks.
Remarks Made During Press Conference
The complaint relates to a recent press conference on the controversy surrounding a mural of late singer Zubeen Garg at Ganeshguri.
During the interaction, Sarma reportedly said that anyone wishing to paint the image of a “revolutionary” could paint Paresh Baruah instead of Che Guevara.
Following the remarks, the youth wing argued that the statement carried legal and public implications because ULFA (Independent) remains a banned organisation under the UAPA.
Organisation Raises Legal Questions
The organisation claimed that the remarks could create public confusion. Moreover, it argued that some people might view the statement as legitimising the image of a banned militant leader.
Furthermore, the youth wing pointed out that authorities have previously taken legal action against citizens for allegedly expressing support for ULFA leaders through social media posts, songs, poems, or photographs.
Therefore, it argued that the same legal standards should apply equally to everyone, including constitutional authorities.
The complaint also stated that equality before the law remains a basic constitutional principle.
Police Asked to Examine the Case
The organisation urged police to preserve the complete audio-video recording and transcript of the press conference.
In addition, it requested investigators to examine whether the remarks attract provisions of the UAPA, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, or any other applicable law.
If investigators find a cognisable offence, the organisation urged police to initiate legal action.
No Official Response Yet
The complaint carries the signatures of president Gyanashree Bora, working president Saurav Bora, and information and publicity secretary Ankuman Bordoloi.
Meanwhile, the organisation said it filed the complaint to protect the country’s sovereignty, unity, and integrity.
However, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and the Assam government have not issued an official response so far.
Question & Answer
Q1. Who filed the complaint?
Answer: Jatiya Yuva Bahini, the youth wing of Raijor Dal.
Q2. Why did the organisation seek an FIR?
Answer: It alleged that the Chief Minister’s remarks could create public confusion and appear to legitimise a banned militant leader.
Q3. Where was the complaint submitted?
Answer: Dispur Police Station in Guwahati.
Q4. Which laws did the organisation mention?
Answer: The UAPA, 1967, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
Q5. Has the Chief Minister responded?
Answer: No. The Chief Minister and the Assam government have not issued an official response.
Location Context
Assam plays a significant role in Northeast India and has experienced insurgency-related challenges for decades. Therefore, statements involving banned organisations often receive close legal, political, and public scrutiny.