In business, profit and loss are the fundamental principles that drive the market. Taking risks is essential for progression, but when business ethics are compromised for profit, major scandals can emerge, causing significant damage to the economy. Many companies often resort to unethical practices to recover from losses, leading them down a precarious path. Today, we will discuss such a company that managed to recover from the losses incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic but failed to clear its name from the allegations and controversies, ultimately tarnishing its reputation. This company is Aslam Architects and Interior Designers Private Limited (AAID), an architectural and interior designing firm embroiled in various controversies and allegations of unethical practices.

Company Background

AAID was established on July 12, 2006, with its registered office located in Bangalore, Karnataka. The current directors of the company are Syed Bhasker Aslam and Anny Samyal.

It is suspicious how quickly the company purportedly recovered the losses incurred during the pandemic, raising serious questions about the legitimacy of their practices.

Why the Allegations and What are the Controversies ?

According to the company, there are no complaints or cases pending against them. AAID claims to be a neat and clean company with high ambitions in the interior designing field. However, sources indicate that several serious allegations have been made, revealing a pattern of unethical and potentially illegal practices.

The company is accused of achieving profits by using low-cost, inferior-quality materials in its construction projects, posing significant risks for the future. It has been alleged that the company has frequently overlooked safety measures to boost its profits, endangering the lives of occupants and workers.

Moreover, while the company’s revenue appears inflated, there is a lack of investment and capital. There is also no confirmation of the number of employees, raising suspicions of the company being a shell company. Shell companies are often used to launder black money and exist only on paper. While they appear legitimate, they have no real existence.

Additionally, the company has been accused of causing disputes during projects, damaging its market reputation, and discouraging others from associating with it. Naturally, no one would want to tarnish their market reputation by collaborating with a company notorious for conflicts and poor practices.

AAID has also been implicated in various unethical business practices, including bribery and corruption. It is alleged that the company has bribed officials to bypass regulations and secure high-value contracts. Such practices not only undermine fair competition but also erode trust in the market.

These allegations have cast a significant shadow over AAID. Despite the company’s attempts to present a clean image, the numerous unconfirmed allegations suggest a troubling pattern of unethical behavior and disregard for safety and quality standards. The company’s reputation has suffered as a result, raising serious questions about its long-term viability and ethical standing in the industry.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here